Inspur SA5212M5 vs Xiaomi 23049PCD8G
| Inspur SA5212M5 | Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Score | 78513 | 3398 | 2310.6% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Geekbench 6.5.0 | Geekbench 6.0.3 | ||
System Information
| Inspur SA5212M5 | Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Datacenter (64-bit) | Android 13 |
| Model | Inspur SA5212M5 | Xiaomi 23049PCD8G |
| Processor |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8255C @ 2.49 GHz
2 Processors, 48 Cores, 96 Threads |
ARM ARMv8 @ 1.80 GHz
1 Processor, 8 Cores |
| Motherboard | Inspur SA5212M5 | marble |
| Memory | 382.66 GB DDR4 SDRAM | 10.91 GB |
| OpenCL Information | ||
| Platform Vendor | NVIDIA Corporation | QUALCOMM |
| Platform Name | NVIDIA CUDA | QUALCOMM Snapdragon(TM) |
| Device Vendor | NVIDIA Corporation | QUALCOMM |
| Device Name | Tesla T4 | QUALCOMM Adreno(TM) |
| Board Name | ||
| Compute Units | 40 | 4 |
| Maximum Frequency | 1590 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Device Memory | 15.0 GB | 5.46 GB |
GPU Performance
| Inspur SA5212M5 | Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Score | 78513 | 3398 | 2310.6% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Background Blur | 37036 | 1328 | 2788.9% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Face Detection | 26664 | 1011 | 2637.4% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Horizon Detection | 93006 | 6706 | 1386.9% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Edge Detection | 101340 | 6810 | 1488.1% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Gaussian Blur | 105698 | 2069 | 5108.7% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Feature Matching | 23955 | 692 | 3461.7% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Stereo Matching | 262947 | 11780 | 2232.1% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
| Particle Physics | 233004 | 17196 | 1355.0% |
| Inspur SA5212M5 | |||
| Xiaomi 23049PCD8G | |||
