Anbernic RG477M vs Anbernic RG477M
| Anbernic RG477M | Anbernic RG477M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Precision | 1747 | 1747 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Half Precision | 1765 | 1765 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Quantized | 3219 | 3219 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Geekbench AI 1.5.0 | Geekbench AI 1.5.0 | ||
System Information
| Anbernic RG477M | Anbernic RG477M | |
|---|---|---|
| AI Framework | TensorFlow Lite | TensorFlow Lite |
| AI Backend | CPU | CPU |
| AI Device | ARM ARMv8 | ARM ARMv8 |
| Operating System | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Model | Anbernic RG477M | Anbernic RG477M |
| Processor |
ARM ARMv8 @ 2.20 GHz
1 Processor, 8 Cores |
ARM ARMv8 @ 2.20 GHz
1 Processor, 8 Cores |
| Processor ID | ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 1 part 3405 revision 0 | ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 1 part 3405 revision 0 |
| Motherboard | k6897v1_64 | k6897v1_64 |
| Memory | 7.64 GB | 7.64 GB |
AI Performance
| Anbernic RG477M | Anbernic RG477M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification (SP) | 1466 | 1466 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Classification (HP) | 1491 | 1491 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Classification (Q) | 2657 | 2657 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Segmentation (SP) | 1548 | 1548 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 1525 | 1525 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Segmentation (Q) | 2910 | 2910 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Pose Estimation (SP) | 2603 | 2603 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Pose Estimation (HP) | 2590 | 2590 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 6392 | 6392 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Object Detection (SP) | 1297 | 1297 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Object Detection (HP) | 1318 | 1318 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Object Detection (Q) | 2151 | 2151 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Face Detection (SP) | 2289 | 2289 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Face Detection (HP) | 2274 | 2274 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Face Detection (Q) | 5154 | 5154 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Depth Estimation (SP) | 2075 | 2075 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Depth Estimation (HP) | 2282 | 2282 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 5125 | 5125 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Style Transfer (SP) | 6319 | 6319 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Style Transfer (HP) | 6193 | 6193 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Style Transfer (Q) | 13289 | 13289 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Super-Resolution (SP) | 1189 | 1189 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Super-Resolution (HP) | 1205 | 1205 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Image Super-Resolution (Q) | 3498 | 3498 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Text Classification (SP) | 711 | 711 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Text Classification (HP) | 730 | 730 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Text Classification (Q) | 1350 | 1350 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Machine Translation (SP) | 1365 | 1365 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Machine Translation (HP) | 1342 | 1342 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Machine Translation (Q) | 679 | 679 | 100.0% |
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
| Anbernic RG477M | |||
